![hitfilm pro countryboy hitfilm pro countryboy](https://xiaotus.com/images/2021/06/06/202106061051389643784.jpg)
The statistical evidence also prompts further reflection on qualitative and quantitative methodologies and the role they play in describing social experience. Our data indicate that heterosexual and non-heterosexual voters had distinct and different experiences of the Survey and were motivated to participate for different reasons. Our analysis draws on original data from a representative survey of Australian voters conducted in 2019 in which we asked participants to reflect on their reasons for voting, their experience of the campaign and their attitudes towards the result. Building on this foundation, we analyse the differential attitudes and experiences of heterosexual and non-heterosexual participants who voted – or declined to vote – in the Survey. Prior analyses of the Survey results, both in academic scholarship and media commentary, have focused on particular social characteristics of those who supported or opposed the legalisation of same-sex marriage. This article examines the attitudes and experiences of participants in the 2017 Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey through an interdisciplinary collaboration joining insights from the humanities and social sciences. 2020 Flaherty and Wilkinson 2020 Bartos, Noon, and Frost 2021). 2019 Casey, Wootton, and McAloon 2020 Chonody et al. Numerous experts from a range of disciplines noted that, despite the eventual legalisation of same-sex marriage, significant negative mental health outcomes were reported at multiple levels for LGBTIQA+ people both leading into and after the Survey (Perales and Todd 2018 Asquith et al. Then-Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, who claimed the Survey and subsequent legalisation of same-sex marriage as a governmental and personal win, was vehemently criticised for ignoring the widespread negative impacts the Survey brought to bear on LGBTIQA+ people (Maiden 2018), particularly youth who bore the brunt of the homophobic and transphobic rhetoric mobilised in public debate, which frequently devolved into scare campaigns by right-wing ideologues around gender, education and children (Gerrard 2020 Thomas, McCann, and Fela 2020), or religious freedom (Richardson-Self, Fielder, and Ezzy 2020, 93). It seems marriage equality is never solely about marriage equality, whatever perspective it is engaged from.